Oral Presentation Rubric
No comment Very weak Weak Sufficient Good Very Good
Score à
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Form
| ||||||
Posture, gestures & eye contact
|
Slouches. Hands in pockets. No attempt to connect with audience.
|
Does not connect with audience.
|
Does not connect well with audience.
|
Speaks at Teacher for most of the presentation.
|
Good despite occasional lapses.
|
Very good Posture. Appropriate gestures when needed. Attends to whole audience
|
Pitch of voice, delivery speed & timing
|
Inaudible voice
|
Much too long/short. Talks too slow/fast
|
Noticeable problems that cause lack of fluency, misunderstanding or a breakdown in communication
|
Too long/short. A tendency to pause unnaturally or produce spurts of language
|
Good despite occasional lapses.
|
Strong clear voice,
|
Use of index cards &/ visual aids
|
Too much written on visual aids
|
Overuse of index cards. Poor usage of visual aids.
|
Relies heavily on index cards
|
Noticeable use of index cards. Visual aids could have been better.
|
Use of index cards doesn’t interfere with proceedings. Adequate use of visual aids
|
Very good, appropriate visual aids, (if used)only glances at index cards occasionally
|
Content
| ||||||
Organization
|
illogical organisation
|
Difficult to follow
|
Continuous backtracking or hesitation
|
Average. Not fully logical
|
Good. Minor lapses
|
Very good. Fully logical
|
Relevance of information
|
Information not related to title
|
Irrelevant information detracts from quality of presentation
|
Some material is irrelevant.
|
Some material seems offline.
|
Good despite occasional lapses
|
Very good. Appropriate. Well balanced
|
Memorization & Mastery
|
Read
|
No evidence of practice
|
Despite some evidence of practice, mastery not demonstrated sufficiently.
|
Some evidence of practice but frequent topic related hesitations disrupt flow.
|
Good control of topic despite minor lapses
|
Very good. Dominates topic at all times. Fully at ease with topic
|
Language
| ||||||
Grammar & Sentence structure
|
Quantity of errors prevents communication of ideas
|
Errors cause breakdowns in communication
|
Most sentences contain errors
|
Noticeable problems that do not deter message coming through
|
Message is generally clear despite some systematic errors
|
Very good. Conveys message well despite errors
|
Vocabulary & Expression
|
Inadequate or constantly inaccurate
|
Weak for level. Noticeable problems with word formation that hinders communication.
|
Despite some evidence of control, errors in word formation or use are numerous
|
Fairly well controlled despite some minor problems with word choice or formation.
|
Overall, vocabulary is appropriate and accurate.
|
Very good. Fully appropriate. Is comfortable with language despite some minor errors
|
Coherence & Cohesion
|
Text unclear due to poor use of cohesive devices or incoherence.
|
Whilst snatches of meaning are clear, text is generally unconnected
|
Linking in or between sentences, or word order (or both) cause instances of incoherence.
|
Despite minor lapses, linking and word order are adequate. Sentences link together fairly well despite minor lapses
|
Language is generally arranged well. No major problems with word order or linking.
|
Very good. Text hangs together well. No major problems with cohesion.
|
Pronunciation
|
Unintelligible
|
Weak pronunciation frequently interferes with message coming across
|
Notable L2 interference that causes problems for audience comprehension.
|
Good despite minor lapses.
|
No major problems despite problems with isolated items.
|
Very good. Nothing that distracts from conveyance of message
|
Comments
Post a Comment